Animal Rights or Science?

on Posted by Rajesh J Advani
Labels: ,
Is it acceptable to take animal life or cause harm or pain to an animal, in the interests of science?

This isn't a new question, and it's not one that both sides are going to agree on in the near future, if ever. Me, I'm all for science. But I'm not happy with animal rights being violated either. (For the record, I eat meat but don't think I'm a hypocrite for being against fur.)

Still, how can you make a decision?

Take for example this story. Scientists are apparently trying to figure out how some animals grow back body parts, so that the same technique can be used with humans. If they figure this out, there's no end to the benefits for medicine. 50,000 people lose a body part to amputation every year in the US alone. If scientists can make the technology work, all these people could have their fingers, hands, arms, and legs back in a matter of weeks or months.

So that's a good thing, right?

Not for the animals that have the regenerative abilities.

Take for example Salamanders. These animals can apparently grow back an arm if it gets severed. How often must scientists make cuts in a salamander's body to find out what chemicals, enzymes or glands are involved in the regrowth? How often does someone cut off a Salamander's body part to observe what happens?

Scientists have got far enough to grow extra arms on salamanders. Does the salamander feel any pain when it is cut, or when it has an extra arm coming out of where there should only be a simple rib? Unless the researchers are extremely careful with anesthetics, there's probably a lot of pain involved for the poor creature. Does the salamander know about the value of the sacrifice it is making? Surely not.

A hundred years from now, the number of people who will have benefited from regenerative technologies will probably be close to one billion. There will still be those who demand that researchers stop testing revolutionary medicine on animals. They will still be right. But so will the scientists.

3 comments:

Scarlett said...

blah

Shilpa said...

It's not blah, Scarlett or whoever you are. You definitely are ignorant of the countless number of sacrifices made each day on the name of scientific research. Wake up lady, it could you be you next!

Nevertheless, the question certainly is not either 'animal rights' OR 'scientific/medical advancement'. It's about having the two work in parallel and still avoiding as much harm to the mute animals as possible.

There have to be regulations for animal killing/organ amputation 'methods'. In fact, so many times the callous attitude of the research agencies takes away many more lives than is ideally required...Regulations around that should be made. I know it's nearly impossible to regulate these activities but economic incentives can be designed to promote a 'kinder' approach to harming animals.

And, all you other Ms. 'blah's of the world, it's totally uncool to harm an animal for useless pleasures like accessories and cosmetic testing! Please don't flaunt that fur coat the next time around, killer-machines!

workhard said...

The hunger for knowledge is unstoppable, and people scientists will do anything for it..


Poetry directory